The Great Gay
Racket
April 19, 2001
Getting
in touch with my feelings the other day, I realized how I loathe
homosexuals. All of them? Of course not. Some of them are funny, kind,
intelligent, and otherwise pleasant. But homosexuals in general, yes. I
cant stand them. Especially the ones who are organized under the
rubric of gay rights.
I guess this makes me
homophobic. So what? Homophobia is one of those
ugly cant-words like racist and sexist that
no self-respecting speaker of the English language would use. (Try to
imagine Abraham Lincoln calling someone homophobic.)
Its a verbal badge of groupthink.
Funny how the people who style
themselves victims always want to bully everyone else. Diversity
now means conformity. It means making sensible people afraid to
contradict nonsense so obvious as to insult their intelligence.
Normal people find homosexuality,
especially male homosexuality, repellent. Were supposed to
apologize for that? Our slang words for the anus, and their use as insults,
express our disgust with the whole idea of anal sex. Apart from the
personal defilement it involves, its grossly unsanitary.
My own feelings are intensified by
personal experience. Believe me, when a child you love has been
sodomized, it takes a lot of the romance out of buggery. What was merely
disgusting becomes nauseating. You neednt hate the perpetrator
who, in this case as in so many others, had been sodomized as a
child himself to feel utter revulsion at the act, and contempt for
those who try to endow it with dignity.
Will the victim now grow up to
sodomize other boys? Will he come down with AIDS? Will he, on his
wedding night, remember this first sexual experience?
Another
instance of homosexual pedophilia has been in the news lately or
rather, hasnt been in the news. In 1999 two Arkansas perverts
raped, tortured, and murdered a 13-year-old boy; that crime has been
almost totally ignored by the same news media that spent a year
bewailing the murder of the homosexual Matthew Shepard. Because the boy
was a victim rather than a victimizer of homosexuals, his story might
hurt The Cause. No martyr he!
The standard gay line
on pedophilia is that most child molesters are heterosexuals. This is sheer
propaganda. Homosexuals are only 1 or 2 percent of the general population
(despite their inflated claims also propagandist of 10
percent), yet they are wildly disproportionate among pedophiles.
What is more important, though, is
that most heterosexuals are more than willing to punish molesters of
little girls. They dont make excuses for them or cover up their
crimes. They recognize norms of behavior.
But pedophiles are an integral part of
the gay rights movement. Does that movement repudiate
them? Not at all. On the contrary, the North American Man/Boy Love
Association is a regular and welcome contingent at gay
pride marches. In England, organized gays agitate for
lowering the age of consent for sex.
This stands to reason. Homosexuality
is an abandonment not only of the normal, but of any norms. Once you
approve of promiscuous anal sex with strangers, how can you draw a line
against anything? Why not have anal sex with kids, if thats your
thing?
And once again, the news media
which love to highlight any extremists at
conservative events refuse to report on pedophiles in the
movement. It might embarrass The Cause. If its
diversity you want, dont look for it among
journalists.
I used to feel sorry for homosexuals.
However they became that way, it was an inclination I could only pity
them for being saddled with, since so much of normal life was closed off
to them. And I understand why parents who find out their sons are
homosexual want to protect them, even if it means denying that
homosexuality is a serious disorder. Thats natural.
But no parent is glad to learn his son
is gay; no parent would wish that condition on a child. This
is why all the propaganda of gay pride rings false. Normal
people arent even proud of being normal; they take it for granted.
But pride in an abnormality?
I dont blame anyone for being
sick. I blame them for telling me that sickness is just another form of
health.
Joseph Sobran
Archive Table of Contents
Current Column
Return to the
SOBRANS
home page
|