THE MEANING OF BROTHERHOOD
July 24, 2003

by Joe Sobran

     At a testimonial dinner for a famous family of movie 
producers, Frank Sinatra offered this tribute: "The 
Warner brothers showed Hollywood the true meaning of 
brotherhood. They were brothers -- and they were hoods."

     This brings me to my own brother Greg. He got off to 
a rocky start in life, one that Charles Dickens would 
weep to describe: he had me for a big brother. No sooner 
had he come home from the hospital than I commenced years 
of ruthless teasing.

     But he rebounded from this early tragedy, and I was 
finally unable to crush his spirit. Luckily for me, 
tormenting a kid brother isn't officially recognized as 
child abuse, or I might be writing this from a prison 
cell. I have never understood why modern psychology has 
never grasped that most childhood traumas are inflicted 
by siblings. Parents still get all the blame. Was Freud 
an only child?

     Be that as it may, Greg has forgiven all. He has 
inherited the artistic spirit and talent of our mother, 
and he is a painter whose work is worthy of Edward 
Hopper. He is too creative to hold grudges; his humor 
remains unimpaired. He was the sweetest, merriest little 
boy I ever knew, and now he is sweeter and funnier than 
ever.

     When I told Greg that I would be a write-in 
candidate for the presidency in 2004, I asked him if I 
could count on his vote. Without alluding to the dead 
past, he assured me that he would certainly consider 
voting for me, but he couldn't honestly promise anything 
until he heard what Al Sharpton had to offer the 
Republic.

     For a moment I was stunned. Not only are we 
brothers, but we agree on nearly everything. One more or 
less assumes the support of one's own family. This is 
especially important in a write-in campaign, where it is 
vital that one's supporters know how to spell the 
candidate's name. If all my relatives vote for me, I'm 
sure to carry at least five states, Michigan, Virginia, 
Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Arizona.

     But on reflection, I saw that Greg's answer was that 
of a true Sobran. Neither race nor consanguinity would 
decide his vote. Unlike many political siblings, he had 
no thought of capitalizing personally on his brother's 
presidency. He was thinking of his country, and he would 
vote strictly on the merits. If the Reverend Sharpton 
presents a vision of America more inspiring than my own, 
so be it. I can only hope that the Sharpton family is 
equally prepared to put country before kinship.

     But how much do families really matter in a national 
election? It may seem that even a large family is too 
demographically insignificant to sway the outcome. And 
usually this is the case. But we have only recently had a 
vivid counterexample. In the last presidential election, 
the electoral vote was closely split between two 
candidates. It came down to a single state: Florida, 
which was also closely split.

     It was an astonishingly close contest. But the 
governor of Florida, Jeb Bush, just happened to be the 
brother of one of the candidates, George W. Bush. Guess 
who won?

     Yes, Bush won. But his victory was tainted. And it 
would have been tainted even worse if he had had brothers 
on the U.S. Supreme Court, which finally decided the 
outcome.

     Greg and I agree that such a result is to be avoided 
at all costs. If I win the presidency, we don't want my 
victory to be under the shadow of a suspicion that I owed 
it to my relatives. I'll have enough trouble just 
avoiding impeachment. (I intend to veto every bill that 
comes across my desk, except those repealing laws that 
are already on the books. I also mean to use executive 
orders to end Federal entitlement payments.)

     So, dear reader, though I fervently want your vote, 
I don't want it because you may happen to be related to 
me, whether by blood, by marriage, or even by adoption. I 
only want it if you are genuinely convinced, as an 
American patriot, that I have more to offer all 
Americans, and not just the Sobrans, than the Reverend 
Sharpton.

     As you step into the voting booth, you might even 
ask yourself, "Which candidate would really be better for 
the Sobrans and Sharptons alike?" Then follow your 
conscience. Just like Greg.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read this column on-line at 
"http://www.sobran.com/columns/2003/030724.shtml".

Copyright (c) 2003 by the Griffin Internet 
Syndicate, www.griffnews.com. This column may not 
be published in print or Internet publications 
without express permission of Griffin Internet 
Syndicate. You may forward it to interested 
individuals if you use this entire page, 
including the following disclaimer:

"SOBRAN'S and Joe Sobran's columns are available 
by subscription. For details and samples, see 
http://www.sobran.com/e-mail.shtml, write 
fran@griffnews.com, or call 800-513-5053."