Well,
at least we wont have a
phony Catholic as president. Im not sure my nerves can bear four
more years of George W. Bush, but Im trying to look on the bright
side.

One advantage of
favoring neither candidate is that no matter which one wins, its a
great relief that the other lost. I awoke on Election Day fearing a Bush
victory; at the end of a long night I was almost elated by John
Kerrys defeat.

As I write, Kerry has
just conceded to Bush, so he wont be appointing federal judges. A
friend suggests that Chief Justice William Rehnquists sudden
illness may have made the difference in this election, by reminding
pro-lifers of the stakes. Of course the other side may have been mobilized by
the same news, and in such a close election its hard to say which
factor was decisive, but this is an interesting reflection.

The Supreme Court
of Massachusetts may have doomed the Democrats when it imposed
sodomatrimony on the state, outraging millions of voters across the
country and making a Massachusetts liberal an especially inapt choice for
a candidate. Kerry never managed to exorcise the strong suspicion that he
sympathized with the loopiest judges on social issues.

It will be revealing
to see how much of the Catholic vote Kerry got. I hope analysis of the
results will show that his altar boy act hurt him more than it helped, but
as Bill Clinton might say, it depends on what you mean by
Catholic.

This unpredictable
election wasnt quite as close as expected; Bush won the popular
vote by more than three million. Oddly enough, Kerry nearly reversed the
results of the 2000 election when he almost won in electoral votes, Ohio
threatening to do this time what Florida did four years ago.

Adding to the
excitement, Osama bin Laden delivered his own October surprise, a video
that suggested hed been watching Michael Moores
Fahrenheit 9/11: He taunted Bush for reading the little
girls book about a goat after the first tower was hit. This too may
have helped Bush. Bin Laden boasted that every dollar al-Qaeda spends
forces the U.S. government to spend a million, which I can well believe
after enduring airport security recently; thanks to Bushs reaction
to 9/11, the man has certainly gotten a lot of bang for his buck.

The Republicans also
gained seats in both houses of Congress, which will strengthen
Bushs hand in his second term, perhaps allowing him to be
somewhat bolder in filling any Supreme Court vacancies. But judging by
his record, I doubt hell want to put up a fight about abortion. It
doesnt seem to interest him, let alone horrify him.

Will he try to find a
way out of the Iraq mess? Hes plenty stubborn, and he continues to
insist that freedom is on the march with a U.S.-imposed
democracy that enjoys little legitimacy in Arab eyes. One
of the big questions about Bush is whether he realizes that his
neoconservative cheerleaders pushed him into a war that went so badly
that it nearly cost him the election.

A year ago Bush
looked invincible. The Democrats were desperately looking for a candidate
who could beat him; then they settled on the dreary liberal Kerry, whose
only strength was Bushs growing unpopularity. But Kerry never
managed to take full advantage of the avalanche of bad news from and
about Iraq, which made Bush so vulnerable. In fact Kerry never really made
it clear where he stood on the war, except that he would somehow do it
better.

Had Kerry won,
hed have had his hands full just trying to fix the messes Bush has
made, budgetary as well as military. With a Republican Congress, he could
hardly have pursued much of a liberal agenda, and he might have had
difficulty getting judges and justices confirmed. As James Burnham used
to observe, presidential agendas usually get derailed by unforeseen events
anyway. Jimmy Carter, for instance, came to the White House with
ambitious plans, only to be completely consumed by inflation and, at the
end, events in Iran.
Voting as a Moral Gesture

Bushs second
term may bring nothing quite so unforeseen as the 9/11 drama, but we can
assume that even with a solidly Republican Congress there will be
surprises; there always are. He has already shown his, shall we say,
indifference to conservative principles, especially limited or
constitutional government. He even makes it his boast that his kind of
conservatism views government as a positive force. Here
again the neocons have encouraged him in his big-government
conservatism, a self-contradictory phrase he avoids but which fits
him.

The strangest part is
that Bush really sees himself, and manages to sell himself, as a true
conservative holding the fort against those crazy liberals. He uses the old
right-wing shibboleths as if he means them; Kerry felt obliged to match
him by stressing his faith, his military record, his love of
hunting, and so forth, but all in vain. The man has Massachusetts written
all over him, as Bush never let us forget, whereas Bush goes out of his
way to seem Texan.

Election-day polling
showed that most voters said they were chiefly concerned with
values, rather than specific issues, and this attitude helps
Republicans more than Democrats. The voters certainly didnt speak
in unison, but Americans, in contrast to Europeans, see voting as a moral
gesture. Bush is quite comfortable with this; Kerry isnt. Kerry
never seemed natural talking faith-talk.

In that respect, the
campaign was fought on Bushs terms. That the race was as close as
it was is a measure of Bushs many failures; he began with
advantages incumbency, a sense of crisis, and an earthy rapport
with ordinary people that should have given him a landslide. A
better campaigner than Kerry would have made the most of all this
years terrible headlines from Iraq.
Its Finally Over

Bushs victory
is already beginning to seem inevitable, though on Election Day it seemed
anything but. Polls and predictions were flying every which way. It was
maddening. How quickly we forget our own uncertainty!

At any rate,
its finally over. Bush has become the first presidential candidate
in 16 years to win more than half the popular vote. The last one was his
father.

More on the election
and what it means will appear, soon, in
SOBRANS, my
monthly newsletter. If you have
not seen it yet, give my office a call at 800-513-5053 and request
a free sample, or better yet, subscribe for two years for just $85. New subscribers
get two gifts with their subscription. More details can be found at the
Subscription page of my website.

Already a subscriber? Consider a gift subscription for a priest, friend, or
relative.
Joseph Sobran