Diane Speaks His Piece
I
have no idea who Diane is, but his e-mail message
sounds angry with me. In
fact, Diane says he is
deeply offended by the pure bigotry of my
column of September 21, Equality Run
Amok, which he finds demeaning.
You may think Diane is an
odd name for a guy, but thats Dianes point. He claims to be a
woman, simply a woman, and identifies himself, in case you
havent already guessed, as a transsexual.
Sorry, Diane, but you
arent a woman; youre a mutilated man. And you arent
a transsexual, because theres no such thing. Let me
know when you get pregnant, and Ill reconsider my position.
Diane informs me that he is
legally a woman which I dont doubt, the law
being what it is these days and is so identified on his baptismal
certificate. He also says hes been married to his
husband for 20 years and is a practicing
Catholic. Sure. He must belong to John Kerrys parish.
By way of enlightening the sons
of darkness, Diane explains (sigh!) that Im confusing transsexuals
with transvestites, homosexuals, drag queens, and such. Transsexualism,
he assures me, is not a choice.
News to me! Id have
thought that if anything was elective surgery, it was ... well, that. But
according to Diane, one is born transsexual a womans brain
trapped in a mans body, and so forth and only later decides
whether to have the doc bring them into alignment. Supportive
studies and research, he goes on, is [sic] giving strong
support to this [view]. Thats always the way with
supportive research, isnt it?
![[Breaker quote: Against transphobia]](2004breakers/041019.gif) Wait,
theres more. Diane, writing in late October, warns me that I may
tip the election to Kerry. It seems that many in the transsexual community
are leaning to President Bush, but are put off by Bush partisans like me
transphobic bigots, he calls them who
preach hate and make unwarranted attacks
against them. And if the 2004 election is as close as the 2000 election,
the transsexual vote could make the difference.
Well, here its my turn to
be deeply offended by Dianes presumption that Im a
Bush partisan. Ive repeatedly said I consider George W. Bush one of
our worst presidents ever. Why do so many transsexuals harbor the
stereotype that we transphobic bigots are Republicans?
I dont pretend to speak
for the entire transphobic community, but my own strong belief is that
transphobia is not a matter of choice. I was born this way, and there is
nothing wrong with it. We are all children of God, and labels
dont mean anything anyway. I very deeply respect Dianes
belief that he is a woman, which is his constitutional right as an
American, but when he tries to legislate that belief on others by having
the government legally certify him as a woman, I draw the line. That
judgment must be left to each of us.
I know many people who consider
themselves women, and I rarely argue the point with them. Most of them
are confident and comfortable in their womanhood and require no
corrective surgery. Many of them marry and have babies. If Diane had ever
had a baby, Im sure hed have mentioned it. That would have
provided him the perfect illustration of my ignorance of transsexualism.
There are always weird people
here and there, but we live in the age of the aggressively abnormal
people who are ever ready to pounce on you for believing what everyone
has always taken for granted, like the existence of two distinct sexes. The
simplest common sense, or even a quip, is now called hate.
It would seem to follow from
Dianes account that transsexualism must also occur among animals
a sows brain trapped in a boars body, a hens
brain trapped in a roosters body. But if so, veterinary science
seems unaware of it and is doing virtually nothing about it. Maybe the
supportive research is still in the early stages.
One of my favorite lines from the
classics has always been Nothing human is alien to me.
After pondering Dianes message, Im not sure I can say that
without qualification.
Joseph Sobran
|