Logo for Joe Sobran's newsletter: Sobran's -- The Real News of the Month

 Body Counts 

October 25, 2005 
In order to show that “we” are winning in Iraq, the U.S. military has decided to resume the abandoned practice of releasing enemy body counts. It’s a bit confusing. The idea, as I understand it, is that the more insurgents are killed by U.S. forces, the sooner Iraq will be free.

In other words, some Iraqis are fighting those who invaded Iraq, Today's 
column is "Body Counts" -- Read Joe's columns the day he writes 
them.but the invaders are trying to defeat them so that Iraq will have freedom.

I’d also like to see body counts of noncombatants, especially women and children. Just curious, you understand. I’m not accusing anyone of anything. Maybe it’s all worth it. But how can the American taxpayer begin to assess the full price of the war without knowing how many people, American and Iraqi, are dying in it?

That’s just basic information. Why is that sort of thing kept secret from us, when we’re told the war is being fought for our benefit? Aren’t we ourselves supposed to decide that? What kind of self-government is it that withholds facts from its own citizens?

Supporters of the war tend to be suspicious of people who ask such questions. We’re supposed to trust our government. If we don’t trust it completely and support the war, says a columnist in the New York Post, we’re in effect helping the enemy, and we may cause the war to be lost at home.

After all, our leaders know more than we do about the foreign danger, just as President Bush knows more than we do about Harriet Miers’s qualifications for the U.S. Supreme Court. Who are we to second-guess them? So goes the argument, anyway. Asking too many questions is unpatriotic.

[Breaker quote for Body Counts: Are "we" winning the Iraq war?]Sometimes our leaders have to deceive us for our own good. The classic case is Franklin Roosevelt, who had to lie to the American people in order to get them into World War II, for their own good, when more than 80 per cent of them thought they were better off staying out of it. Roosevelt was proved right when the United States won the war. After the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, Americans stopped asking unpatriotic questions about him, millions died, and today he is remembered as one of our greatest presidents.

Wise leaders often have to save democracies from the people, just as the police may sometimes have to plant incriminating evidence on suspects who they are pretty sure are guilty but who might be acquitted by a jury. That’s one way to look at it. After all, Henry V is remembered as one of England’s greatest kings for invading and conquering France. Today France is free. You can’t argue with success.

Lincoln saw that the country couldn’t remain free if Southern states seceded from the Union, so he invaded them. He also saw that freedom was threatened by Northerners who opposed the invasion, so he had them thrown in jail and shut down their newspapers. Freedom was saved, 600,000 young men died, and today he too is remembered as one of our greatest presidents.

Drastic measures aren’t always necessary. People are a strange mix of courage and timidity, and often they are more effectively controlled by subtle social pressures than by crude threats. The man who might be roused to fight by the challenge of torture and death may cower at being sneered at in the faculty lounge. In the one case, he knows his manhood is being tested; in the other, he may not realize he’s being tested at all. This sort of social conformity is so powerful because it’s hardly conscious.

For some time, most Americans supported the Iraq war not because Bush used any real threats of repression, but because of what we now call peer pressure; as I like to put it, public opinion is what everyone thinks everyone else is thinking. But that only works until people start admitting their doubts to each other.

It has now sunk in that Iraq was never a threat to us. It was all a fiction that has gradually expired, and now the only “justification” for the war is that it is being won. But few Americans are likely to believe that either, at this point, no matter what the body counts may say. The only question that matters now is what the U.S. Government has done to the people of Iraq. Don’t hold your breath waiting for a straight answer to that one.

Joseph Sobran

Copyright © 2005 by the Griffin Internet Syndicate,
a division of Griffin Communications
This column may not be reprinted in print or
Internet publications without express permission
of Griffin Internet Syndicate

small Griffin logo
Send this article to a friend.

Recipient’s e-mail address:
(You may have multiple e-mail addresses; separate them by spaces.)

Your e-mail address:

Enter a subject for your e-mail:

Mailarticle © 2001 by Gavin Spomer
Archive Table of Contents

Current Column

Return to the SOBRANS home page.

FGF E-Package columns by Joe Sobran, Sam Francis, Paul Gottfried, and others are available in a special e-mail subscription provided by the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation. Click here for more information.

Search This Site

Search the Web     Search SOBRANS

What’s New?

Articles and Columns by Joe Sobran
 FGF E-Package “Reactionary Utopian” Columns 
  Wanderer column (“Washington Watch”) 
 Essays and Articles | Biography of Joe Sobran | Sobran’s Cynosure 
 The Shakespeare Library | The Hive
 WebLinks | Books by Joe 
 Subscribe to Joe Sobran’s Columns 

Other FGF E-Package Columns and Articles
 Sam Francis Classics | Paul Gottfried, “The Ornery Observer” 
 Mark Wegierski, “View from the North” 
 Chilton Williamson Jr., “At a Distance” 
 Kevin Lamb, “Lamb amongst Wolves” 
 Subscribe to the FGF E-Package 

Products and Gift Ideas
Back to the home page 


SOBRANS and Joe Sobran’s columns are available by subscription. Details are available on-line; or call 800-513-5053; or write Fran Griffin.

Reprinted with permission
This page is copyright © 2005 by The Vere Company
and may not be reprinted in print or
Internet publications without express permission
of The Vere Company.